Complex Intelligent Systems

Tuesday, October 09, 2007

Evolve rather than invent, and a science oath

Don’t invent, evolve on the economist, cheers greythumb. Also, an official scientists hippocratic oath, proposed an currently being used in the UK (also on the guardian here and here), cheers to the science show.

2 Comments:

  • The differential terminology (analogy i think it should be) of:
    Invention & Innovation .!
    Invention & Innovation are & thus have(by default) always relied upon either by via "one of two things". Either there never was anything that "solved" a problem .. Or: There was something that was used to solve part of the problem .. but it needs improvements, to allow it to be MORE useful in the initial proble, as well as across other (future potential) problems. Hence: Innovation & Invention .. are both at odds with each other - yet fully co-dependent upon each other (at exactly the same moment in time).
    I utilize both.
    And then I "play" with the results..
    re:
    http://www.google.co.nz/search?q=blogger+QUIX4U&oq=blogger+QUIX4U&sugexp=chrome,mod=13&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

    & Or:
    Via about 250 other websites that I post across..

    http://www.youtube.com/user/QUIX4U
    & or... / http://tiny.cc/K_RAY_Z ..
    or ? http://www.eFlowers4U.co.nz
    ...or ? http://www.WSTLNZ.co.nz
    (etcetera, etcetera, etc)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:36 pm  

  • Oh & p.s..:
    I finally found the link

    I too am on Blogger.com
    (not very often - but I am here)

    http://www.blogger.com/profile/03529948759401617673

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4:38 pm  

Post a Comment

<< Home